How Investment Arbitration Protects Turkish Investors in Africa

← Back to Knowledge Bank
Investment arbitration provides a neutral forum for resolving disputes between foreign investors and states. With approximately 15–20 known Turkish investor–African state cases initiated, knowing how to structure your investment before a dispute arises is what separates recoverable losses from total write-offs.
Key Insights
  • Turkish companies in the energy and infrastructure sectors are specifically protected by international law and investment arbitration.
  • This procedure offers a neutral forum against risks related to political and regulatory instability.
  • Structuring investments with treaty protection from "day one" allows companies to avoid government interference and negotiate from a position of strength.

Africa: The Strategic Expansion Frontier

Africa is no longer merely an emerging opportunity for Turkish companies — it is a strategic expansion frontier. Over the past two decades, Türkiye has built a deep economic presence across the continent through trade, infrastructure, energy, and construction investments.

Which sectors does Turkey operate in Africa?

Turkish investments are concentrated primarily in infrastructure, energy, mining, textiles, and defence. Senegal, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and more recently Libya and Somalia, are at the centre of Turkey's commercial outreach.

The energy sector is the biggest driver of this expansion. At peak supply, Karpowership vessels have reportedly provided up to 15% of Senegal's electricity, the vast majority of Sierra Leone's supply, and nearly all grid power in Guinea-Bissau. Simultaneously, Turkish construction companies are undertaking multi-billion dollar projects such as the Standard-Gauge Railway in Tanzania.

Opportunities and institutional support

Turkey has supported this growth through its "Opening to Africa" initiative (1998) and the "Africa Partnership Policy" (2013). Today, DEİK has established Joint Business Councils with 45 African countries, and Turkish Airlines connects Istanbul to 40 countries across the continent.

However, alongside these opportunities, the region carries inherent risks. Political shifts, recent military coups in the Sahel region, and geopolitical realignments can leave investors exposed to expropriation, sudden regulatory changes, or government interventions that devastate profitability.

Consider a Turkish energy company with a 15-year power purchase agreement. If a new administration unilaterally revises the tariff structure, a company without knowledge of the applicable BIT faces slow, politically exposed local courts. With a BIT, that same company can initiate international arbitration in a neutral forum, seeking interim measures to mitigate damages immediately.

The Scale of Turkey–Africa Investment Activity

$77.8B Turkish contracting projects completed in Africa
$34.5B Turkey–Africa bilateral trade volume (2021)
45 African countries with Joint Business Councils

Türkiye's African Initiative Policy, which started in 1998, gained momentum when the country became an observing member and strategic partner of the African Union in 2005 and 2008 respectively. The total trade volume with Africa has increased from USD 5.4 billion in 2003 to USD 34.5 billion in 2021 — an eightfold increase in under two decades.

Turkish defence industry exports to Africa rose by 653% from 2015 to 2021, while Turkish Airlines routes to the continent grew by approximately 1,140% since 2005. None of Ankara's regional rivals has invested as much on the continent, making Türkiye an increasingly indisputable regional power in Africa.

Lessons From the Past: The Libya Precedent

Turkish investors have initiated approximately 15–20 investment treaty cases across Africa, primarily targeting Libya following the 2011 Arab Spring. These disputes were triggered by security collapses, looting, and chronic non-payment. Investors typically argued that host governments failed to provide "Full Protection and Security" as required by bilateral treaties.

The rulings from international tribunals (ICSID and ICC) have been mixed:

Investor Win
Cengiz v. Libya

The tribunal ruled in favour of the investor, awarding approximately $50 million in damages for the state's failure to protect assets. The claim was well-framed around the Full Protection and Security standard.

State Win
Tekfen v. Libya

The tribunal sided with the state, finding that the breakdown of authority was so severe that no treaty violation could be established under the circumstances.

Dismissed
İçkale v. Turkmenistan

A parallel case in Central Asia where the tribunal dismissed claims for lack of merit. The investor's conduct during the dispute was found to undermine its own legal position.

The difference between a successful claim and a loss often lies in how the claim was framed, what treaty standard was invoked, and whether the investor's conduct supported their legal position.

The "Protection Gap" by the Numbers

As of early 2026, there are approximately 1,440 registered investment arbitration cases worldwide, with roughly 400 of these brought against African states. While Turkish investors are active in mining, electricity, and gas, a significant protection gap remains.

The majority of Turkish investors in Africa have never conducted a "BIT audit". Many operate outside treaty protection because their corporate vehicle does not qualify as a "protected investor" or the relevant BIT was not identified during the structuring stage.

A BIT that exists on paper offers no protection if the investor's corporate structure or conduct during a dispute disqualifies them from invoking it. The time to ensure your investment is protected is at the signing of the contract — not when a crisis has already erupted.

Strategy Begins at Signing

Türkiye is on the way to becoming a genuine regional power in Africa. In this context, international arbitration is not just a safety net — it is a deterrent. States are less likely to interfere with investments they know are shielded by an enforceable BIT and an investor prepared to use it.

The practical lesson from the Libya cases and the broader African arbitration landscape is consistent: investors who structure carefully, document diligently, and engage counsel early recover. Those who do not often find that no legal remedy can undo the damage already done.

Need Investment Structuring or Pre-Dispute Advisory?

Özgören Law Firm, in cooperation with NaFaSi Energy Hub, serves as the dedicated legal bridge between Turkish investors and African markets.

Get in Touch →
About the Authors
Selin Özgören LL.M. International Arbitration Lawyer
Özgören Law Firm, İzmir

LL.M. Bocconi University (full scholarship). Former UNCITRAL Secretariat, HKIAC, Allen & Overy, and Baker McKenzie intern. Specialist in cross-border arbitration involving Turkish and African parties.

LM
Lindy Moyo LL.M. Co-Founder
NaFaSi Energy Hub · The Chance for Africa

Co-founder of NaFaSi Energy Hub, focused on sustainable energy investment and legal frameworks bridging African markets with international investors.

This article is published for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should obtain independent legal counsel before making any investment or structuring decisions. © Özgören Law Firm 2026. All rights reserved.